Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.
Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.
Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than the next cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).
Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.
File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as the next cloud is concerned).
It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.
In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
When compared to next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. The next cloud only has to be in a folder.
You will need to share a URL which means you can't share music files or videos.
According to the report, there is a saying that N drive looks like an area drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, which is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It's far better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***
It is very specialized in playing music. In particular, it's the only cloud that can play sound sources in an environment much like MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play around 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)
It has a large capacity. It is just a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.
You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, if a picture is contained in a document, it really is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And when you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you will need to discover the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.
It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you focus on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. This can be a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.
It is easy to connect to other Google services such as for example Gmail.
If you don't upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.
There are probably the most apps that may be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.
Upload a small pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it is a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.
If you are using Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and use MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude compared to office programs applied to computers.Is it obvious?)
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify before start of playback. It is the best in the world when it comes to media reading.
There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit which might be uploaded from a free account is the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.
The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity may be the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...
There is a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected in real time when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.
The dropbox itself cannot be documented.
There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you want to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and work on it leisurely.
In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little use of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on some type of computer than pay attention to it for a test.
The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).
It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a bit slow.***
The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.
The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.
My blog post ... 웹하드 사이트